What is linguistic anthropology?
linguistic anthropology The invention dates back to the nineteenth century, 19 were born in the U.S. where some research paradigms: Boaz emerges the idea of \u200b\u200blanguage as a code is essential because it allows us to have a window on world. Anthropology see the language as a means of access to that part invisible in the human. Next, comes a new paradigm: language as action, and as a form of social organization.
The study of speech events and speech events as indicators of language conceived as action. From here, exit out of the conversational analysis, which he sees as making social conversation. The language is seen as a dynamic element and not as a world already fixed, rather than part of a social world. Thus, we can almost see a social analysis through the use of language.
dell'etnopragmatica The idea stems from the desire from the meeting of two cultural practices, namely the idea ethno ethnography of communication, but also the idea of \u200b\u200betnoteoria, ie how to study a social group of individuals in a given community but the idea of \u200b\u200breconnecting the person, the theory of social life, as expressed by 'English expression "what we are about." This anthropological approach to our social existence gives way to investigate how people think, can be seen and perceived within a community.
Geertz and Mauss introduced the concept of the "moi", later became the concept of person as a mask. Therefore, plays an important role in the etnoteoria action, since each culture has specific ways of and true understanding of "being in the world."
Practically, to achieve a greater understanding of the role of language in social reality, we must make this journey dell'andirivieni between the familiar and the unknown, leading to being strange what is familiar and vice versa.
Husserl speaks of "natural attitude" of the world, that's how the world goes without saying. This world is made up of values, things, strangers, enemies, friends and colleagues.
So the question is to understand what makes us human and at the same time separates us from the world of Italian and French? As you can see or feel the people inside Italian and French linguistic community (this was my addition).
At this point emerges the concept of "agency" of agency, ie we have control of our actions and words, which have feedback on other people and are being evaluated (in effect), or the " do "should be" efficiency "on things.
Other very important role is played by the pragmatic, which has changed the way of language, as brought to the fore the notion of making the language (perhaps omitting the appearance of the tongue) (I personally believe that the study expressivity in the languages \u200b\u200bis a way of deal in terms of aesthetic language). With the pragmatic
enter the maximum fee in full Grice with the concept of Face (face) of Goffman. According to Durand, the shortcomings of pragmatics are to be found in the fact that not investigate the phenomenon of 'what the language allows the language to do what they do? What makes this discourse (academic conference, for example). If we take the example of yours, the question is: what are the conditions that make possible this kind of exchange? Then from the anthropological point of view, we must think about the context, objects, to how we are guided in the world. Intersubjectivity holds an important place, because it reveals a concept ampio dell'essere sociale e dell'essere insieme. Elementi come “la comprensione reciproca” o “la condivisione della comprensione” vanno da sé nel nostro mondo, mentre il solo studio della linguistica rende la lingua solitaria.
Possiamo dire che nei vari paradigmi che hanno caratterizzato il pensiero dell'antropologia linguistica, la costante ha visto il linguaggio come un medium non neutrale, il che ha portato alla relatività linguistica, dove la lingua non è mai neutra nel codificare l'azione.
Le domande al centro della riflessione di Duranti sono: In che modo la nostra disciplina di studio ci aiuta o ci ostacola nella nostra comprensione del nostro essere al mondo? Che cosa si nasconde dietro language? How can we make better use of local and academic theories to understand the universal conditions of what we are?
Intersubjectivity, intentionality, or exist as universals exist before the conflict and diversity, before reaching a certain normativity?
Therefore, our starting point detector always sees the language as a mirror or a social group in the making.
0 comments:
Post a Comment